~dr|z3d
@RN
@RN_
@StormyCloud
@eyedeekay
@orignal
@postman
@zzz
%Liorar
+FreefallHeavens
+Xeha
+bak83_
+cumlord
+hk
+poriori
+profetikla
+uop23ip
Arch
DeltaOreo
FreeRider
Irc2PGuest10850
Irc2PGuest19353
Irc2PGuest23854
Irc2PGuest46029
Irc2PGuest48064
Meow
Nausicaa
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
Over
T3s|4__
acetone_
anon4
anu
boonst
enoxa
mareki2pb
mittwerk
plap
shiver_
simprelay
solidx66
u5657_1
weko_
Opicaak
I propose new argument, or value for already existing argument, for i2p tunnels, something like "inbound.quantity = dynamic," it would add more tunnels to the tunnel pool based on the number of leasesets, for example.
orignal
yes it makes sense
orignal
if it's your client tunnel you connect to one remote server and you can use 2-3 tunnels
orignal
if you are a proxy you might want to set even 16 if you connect to many eepsites
dr|z3d
dynamic tunnel count has been proposed before. something along the lines of what snark already uses.
Opicaak
I'm not sure what snark does, but the feature would be cool to have, instead of "hardcoding" a specific count.
obscuratus
I *think* i2psnark is using the reduceonidle setting. So you ask for two-three tunnels (or whatever), but it automatically reduces the # of tunnels after an idle period.
Opicaak
Inverse it, "increaseOnUse"
dr|z3d
it allocates tunnels based on the number of client connections.
dr|z3d
but that's not the only metric to use.
dr|z3d
bandwidth usage was also discussed as a metric.
Opicaak
Was there a reason why it wasn't implemented?
dr|z3d
yeah, because other things were more important, like mitigating the ddos attacks.
dr|z3d
and at the time, I think SSU2 was being worked on. that was a substantial amount of work that needed full attention.
Irc2PGuest39757
I would actually need this feature in i2pd, thinking about it.
orignal
because I'm too busy
dr|z3d
eyedeekay: did you merge a bunch of your commits with obscuratus' code dump?
eyedeekay
Yes obscuratus contributed to test1 which is what you're probably seeing
dr|z3d
painful.
dr|z3d
didn't we have a discussion a while back about separate commits for different sub-systems?
dr|z3d
I mean, I get that obscuratus' commit was going to be huge, and there probably wasn't an easy way to do that in sections.
dr|z3d
but then we have a bunch of totally unrelated and unnecessary naming changes that really didn't need to be in the commit at all.
dr|z3d
I'm specifically thinking of the banlistForever/banlistHard changes and related renaming.
dr|z3d
I've merged the code now, but I'd prefer not to have to do something like that again in a single commit. Took several hours :|
dr|z3d
anyways, moving on. is it safe to globally replace all references to context.netDb().lookupRouter... with _context.floodfillNetDb().lookupRouter ?
orignal
did grandpa say anything?
dr|z3d
no
orignal
maybe this is not zzz
dr|z3d
he passed the nickserv auth test, it's more than likely him.
obscuratus
dr|z3d: No, most context.netDb() should probably be explicity moved to context.netDb(dbid). But only go to floodfill if you want the floodfill, otherwise you'll lose segmentation.
obscuratus
having said that, context.netDb() defaults to the floodfill db.
dr|z3d
I'm at the end of addressing merge issues where context.netDb() is causing compile failure, so all instances where it is I've moved to context.floodfillNetDb() and everything appears fine now.
orignal
or his computer is hijacked
obscuratus
orignal: Lol.
Opicaak
Or echelon spoofed zzz
orignal
Nazi is not in the US
obscuratus
dr|z3d: OK, canon builds, so these must be your customizations. So it's your call then.
orignal
yes, it's possible
dr|z3d
orignal: make sure you're wearing your tin hat or he'll zap you from his remote control laser located on a private satellite.
orignal
zzz.i2p still down?
Opicaak
Yeah
orignal
so probably yes, it's Nazi's game
dr|z3d
if we're defaulting to floodfill db, then it seems like a minor thing. works, anyways.
obscuratus
It's probably zzz's bot. Maybe accidental, maybe he's lurking.
dr|z3d
this is mostly for peer lookups.
orignal
lurking what?
orignal
he can read major's logs
obscuratus
So far, all my RI are going to the floodfill db. If I run with floodfill off, all my LS go exclusively to the client dbs.
dr|z3d
how about we give him some time to settle back in before we all shout out the first conspiracy theory that trips of the tongue?
Opicaak
The earth is flat.
eyedeekay
Birds aren't real
obscuratus
dr|z3d: Hahaha! Us? What is this patience word anyways?
RN
birds are not real
orignal
zzz.i2p would be the bets proof
dr|z3d
obscuratus: this is just for peer lookups, so I'm assuming pushing those to the ff db is perfectly fine.
orignal
*best
obscuratus
dr|z3d: Yes.
dr|z3d
ok, thanks.
obscuratus
dr|z3d: Just, if you're doing anything with InboundMessageDistributor, be careful if you change the direction of any stores.
dr|z3d
I don't think I've touched that code, but noted, thanks.
obscuratus
If the DSM comes into the IBMD, it should be saved to the client netdb, even if it's RI (which I havent seen yet).
dr|z3d
not touched it in any meaningful way that would impact things.
obscuratus
Just for clarity, if you run with FF enabled, the floodfill db will populate with LS and RI, so don't worry if you see that.
obscuratus
dr|z3d: If you need it, I've kept a parallel branch that has nearly every commit separated. One mega-commit does look busy. :)
dr|z3d
I've merged now, thanks, obscuratus, but in future if these huge commits can be broken down into smaller commits relating to specific sub-systems, it makes for reverting commits easier and generally understanding the code.
dr|z3d
What definitely should not be happening is unrelated commits getting bundled with the merge.
dr|z3d
obscuratus: so just to be clear, RouterInfo info = _context.netDb().lookupRouterInfoLocally(h); should use the floofdillNetDb() context?
dr|z3d
yeah, send them over, orignal
dr|z3d
Elon_Reeve_Musk_X can do his best.
orignal
it's Plaz
dr|z3d
lol
dr|z3d
what you gone and done to rattle his cage?
orignal
I told him if he need to annoy someone annoy Nazi
dr|z3d
yeah, but he's spamming your network, no?
dr|z3d
obviously someone pulled his chain.
orignal
yes, but it's not new
orignal
belive me it's real plaz
orignal
because he is also spamming me in telegram )))
RN
he must like you
RN
so much attention. <3
orignal
he is just plaz
orignal
that's all
RN
and the one you call nazi is not the only one who would be annoyed
obscuratus
dr|z3d: Yes, for now, I can't think of a case where we'd go to the client db for RI.
dr|z3d
obscuratus: ok, thanks, figured that would be the case, just wanted to be sure.
orignal
he is the best traget
orignal
dr|z3d you are not able to read #ru at ilita I guess
dr|z3d
I'm not on the network, no.
orignal
you read #dev from major
orignal
but not #ru )))
dr|z3d
sure, there's that, not that I've been following #dev on major for a couple of months or more.
obscuratus
I bet I know why zzz's bot showed up. zzz's proabably at Burning Man (why wouldn't he be?), and he's been hanging out with Elon Mush, and he's showing him how great we would be for X.
RN
LOL