IRCaBot 2.1.0
GPLv3 © acetone, 2021-2022
#saltr
/2022/10/05
~dr|z3d
@RN
@RN_
@StormyCloud
@T3s|4_
@eyedeekay
@orignal
@postman
@zzz
%Liorar
+FreefallHeavens
+Leopold
+Xeha
+acetone
+bak83
+cumlord
+hk
+profetikla
+scottpedia
+uop23ip
+weko
An0nm0n
Arch
Dann
DeltaOreo
Irc2PGuest35128
Irc2PGuest61987
Irc2PGuest99418
KiloDelt1
Meow
Nausicaa
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
Over1
T3s|4__
anon
anu
boonst
carried6590
mareki2pb
not_bob_afk
poriori_
qend-irc2p_
shiver_
simprelay
solidx66_
thetia
u5657
woodwose
AmyMalik had a dumb idea
AmyMalik it's for preventing MAIL FROM forgery in i2p and tor, by providing a token system, where the recipient server would hold up the sender, contact the putative sender server's token program, ask the sender server "do you recognize this token?", and it'd give a K for yes, Z for "maybe quarantine it?" or D for no - which would then be used to decide the disposition of the message. Unlike
AmyMalik with clearnet email, where there's an IP address, and my personal recommended action for SPF fail is to quarantine, I would recommend, for a token exchange fail, that the receiving mailer drop the message, either 4xx 4.x.x for a Z or a "you forgot to turn up your token server", or 5xx 5.x.x barred by sender policy for a D from the token server.