~dr|z3d
@RN
@RN_
@Stormycloud
@T3s|4
@T3s|4_
@postman
@zzz
%Liorar
%ardu
%cumlord
+FreefallHeavens
+HowardPlayzOfAdmin
+Onn4l7h
+Onn4|7h
+Xeha
+hk
+profetikla
+r00tobo
+uop23ip
+weko
Arch
BubbRubb
C341
Danny
DeltaOreo
Irc2PGuest29044
Irc2PGuest41581
Irc2PGuest53893
Irc2PGuest54912
Irc2PGuest82639
Meow
Over1
acetone_
b4dab00m
f00b4r_
halloy13412
llamafan717
maylay
moe_
nnm--
not_bob_afk
orignal
pisslord
poriori_
r00tobo[2]
shiver_
simprelay
solidx66
u5657
wew-
zer0bitz_
AmyMalik
had a dumb idea
AmyMalik
it's for preventing MAIL FROM forgery in i2p and tor, by providing a token system, where the recipient server would hold up the sender, contact the putative sender server's token program, ask the sender server "do you recognize this token?", and it'd give a K for yes, Z for "maybe quarantine it?" or D for no - which would then be used to decide the disposition of the message. Unlike
AmyMalik
with clearnet email, where there's an IP address, and my personal recommended action for SPF fail is to quarantine, I would recommend, for a token exchange fail, that the receiving mailer drop the message, either 4xx 4.x.x for a Z or a "you forgot to turn up your token server", or 5xx 5.x.x barred by sender policy for a D from the token server.