@eyedeekay
+R4SAS
+RN
+RN_
+T3s|4
+Xeha
+not_bob
+orignal
FreeRider
Irc2PGuest75862
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
T3s|4_
aargh3
acetone_
anon4
cancername
eyedeekay_bnc
profetikla
shiver_1
u5657
weko_
x74a6
orignal
guys, somebody pointed me to this page
orignal
"Using i2pd" section is wrong
orignal
can it be fixed?
orignal
inbound.backupQuantity = 2
orignal
outbound.backupQuantity = 2
orignal
i2cp.dontPublishLeaseSet = true
orignal
first two don't exists in i2pd
orignal
last one is not needed for client
orignal
[SSH-SERVER] section must contain host
zzz
^^^ eyedeekay you wrote that, can you fix it please?
orignal
Posted: 2019-06-15
orignal
Author: idk
orignal
yes I see
orignal
somebody complained his tunnels didn't start
orignal
I ask where he got such config from
orignal
and he pointed to ru version of that page ))
orignal
that was something new for me
dr|z3d
that raises an interesting point, orignal, namely the purpose of the backup tunnel config. not sure it's that useful.
dr|z3d
we have some forward momentum with stormycloud, zzz.
zzz
I know, because I'm the one pushing it dr|z3d . how are you involved?
dr|z3d
I've encouraged them via an initial approach to rambler to jump on irc, they want some help with configuration etc. they should be around later.
zzz
what's rambler's involvement?
dr|z3d
go between. they got in touch with him because he's visible on twitter and has promoted purokishi.
zzz
I know they got some help from acetone already
dr|z3d
last I heard they were having issues with the speed of the outproxies they're running, but I guess we'll find out more later if they appear here.
zzz
I started this several days ago, we're trying to provide motivation on multiple fronts, several people involved
dr|z3d
sure, it looks it's working :)
zzz
I do think your experience/advice will be useful, we just have to be careful to guide them with requirements and let them arrive at a solution that works for their setup
dr|z3d
indeed. I don't think a prescriptive approach is what they need, and I'm starting on that basis.
dr|z3d
open mind..
zzz
super. if the motivation works perhaps we can have a default in 3 months, but they haven't offered a timeline and I haven't asked
zzz
obviously we need this release out first to get them out of sybil jail
dr|z3d
true, true. 100 high bandwidth routers in the doghouse obviously not optimal for the network at large :)
zzz
esp. when we're banning them but i2pd isn't
dr|z3d
we have sybil detection, i2pd has trusted routers. each could do with the other :)
zzz
we have trusted routers via same-family
dr|z3d
I was looking at that recently and it looks like it's work in progress, wasn't aware you could nominate a family for the first hop?
zzz
no
dr|z3d
I was referring to this:
dr|z3d
* For future restricted routes. Does nothing now.
dr|z3d
*/
dr|z3d
class BuildTrustedLinksJob extends JobImpl {
zzz
that dates back to jrandom
dr|z3d
there's also protected boolean shouldSelectExplicit(TunnelPoolSettings settings) in TunnelPeerSelector, presumably the same intent.
zzz
I suppose there's several things you might do or not do with routers that are 'trusted', I don't have a list, nor do I know what i2pd does
dr|z3d
i2pd allows you to nominate specific routers (and/or families?) to use exclusively for the first hop.
dr|z3d
though sybil detection and restricted routes may appear orthogonal issues, they're both sybil mitigation strategies I guess.
zzz
explicit works and I use it for testing
zzz
I also have out of tree mods to force a particular ff for lookups/stores
zzz
it's all extremely fragile and can croak the whole router if the specified router is down or rejects or isn't found or or or
dr|z3d
currently just supports a single router hash?
dr|z3d
oh, it's a list.
zzz
explicit is a list, my ff stuff is try-this-one-first
zzz
explicit right now only does it a % of the time, as an easy workaround to the issues above
dr|z3d
so if that was extended to accept families, both the explicitPeers option, and your ff mod (in addition to a list), might be more robust.
dr|z3d
explict and ff patch could just fallback to normal routing in the event the nominated router(s) aren't found.
dr|z3d
with a nice WARN level message in the logs, obviously :)
zzz
for explicit you have to have the RI already because there's no code path to do a lookup
dr|z3d
ok, and fallback is 0 hop it looks like?
zzz
and I don't think it's for first hop, just for somewhere
dr|z3d
that seems dodgy.
dr|z3d
presumably invoking SingleSearchJob wouldn't be too much of a stretch, in the event the RI isn't found, or an iterative search?
zzz
there's some 10-15 year old post on my forum of all the things "restricted routes" *might* mean, with possible use cases
zzz
you're thinking implementation, you're not thinking top down what is this for and how would it work reliably
dr|z3d
a good start would probably be feature parity with i2pd, and sure, you're probably right, though I have _some_ idea of potential use cases.
zzz
sure
zzz
zzz.i2p/topics/114 (2008)
dr|z3d
thanks
zzz
whatever the goal is, it's not 'fix janky test configs'
zzz
nor is it 'find ancient jrandom stubs and finish them'
dr|z3d
:)
zzz
gotta come at it from the other direction
dr|z3d
absolutely. namely "how could this benefit us now?"
dr|z3d
> hide IP complelely (hidden + restricted routes).. check.. geoip (include/exclude country or country list).. check.. frustrate sybil attacks.. check...