@eyedeekay
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+RN_
+acetone
+dr|z3d
+not_bob_afk
+orignal
+postman
+qend-irc2p
Arch
BubbRubb
Chrono
Daddy
Danny
DeltaOreo
FreefallHeavens
HowardPlayzOfAdmin
Irc2PGuest15595
Irc2PGuest33339
Irc2PGuest34005
Irc2PGuest76405
Irc2PGuest77730
Leopold_xmpp_
Onn4l7h
Over
Sisyphus
Sleepy
T3s|4
T3s|4_
Teeed
aargh
ardu
b3t4f4c3__
bak83
cumlord
dr4wd3_
duanin2
duck
eyedeekay_bnc
hagen_
hk
kaffi
mareki2p_
nnm--
ohThuku1
poriori
pory
profetikla
r00tobo
rapidash
shiver_
snex
solidx66_
thetia
tr
u5657
uop23ip
w8rabbit
wew
wodencafe2
x74a6
T3s|4
o/ zzz - I'm really impressed by the amount of effort you've devoted to ssu2 evaluation, given the still 'limited' number of routers involved in testing. Are we still far too early from your POV to enable ssu2 by default for several releases, or are you planning a randomized, slower roll out (i.e. 5-10% of routers ssu2 enabled by default, with an opt-out option), beginning with
T3s|4
1.8.1 (aka 0.9.55)? Would obtaining a far larger ssu2 'tester' router/user base help you in the next release?
zzz
T3s|4, no decisions made yet, we're going to discuss it at the next meeting in #ls2 next Monday, 6:30 PM UTC, if you'd like to join us
T3s|4
noted, and thanks zzz