@eyedeekay
&Irc2PGuest88200
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+StormyCloud
+T3s|4
+acetone
+altonen
+dr|z3d
+eche|off
+hagen
+mareki2p
+orignal
+postman
+radakayot
+segfault
+snex
Arch2
BubbRubb
Danny
DeltaOreo
FreefallHeavens
Irc2PGuest30001
Irc2PGuest53192
Irc2PGuest59134
Irc2PGuest59581
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
SigSegv
Sisyphus
Sleepy
aeiou
ardu
b3t4f4c3___
bak83_
boonst
carried6590
cumlord
death
dr4wd3
duck
enoxa
eyedeekay_bnc
not_bob_afk
onon_1
phobos_
pisslord
poriori
profetikla
qend-irc2p
rapidash
shiver_1
solidx66
u5657
uop23ip
w8rabbit
weko_
wodencafe2
x74a6
T3s|4
o/ zzz - I'm really impressed by the amount of effort you've devoted to ssu2 evaluation, given the still 'limited' number of routers involved in testing. Are we still far too early from your POV to enable ssu2 by default for several releases, or are you planning a randomized, slower roll out (i.e. 5-10% of routers ssu2 enabled by default, with an opt-out option), beginning with
T3s|4
1.8.1 (aka 0.9.55)? Would obtaining a far larger ssu2 'tester' router/user base help you in the next release?
zzz
T3s|4, no decisions made yet, we're going to discuss it at the next meeting in #ls2 next Monday, 6:30 PM UTC, if you'd like to join us
T3s|4
noted, and thanks zzz