@eyedeekay
&kytv
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+dr|z3d
+hagen
+hk
+lbt
+not_bob_afk
+postman
+radakayot
+weko
+wodencafe
Arch
Danny
DeltaOreo
FreefallHeavens_
Irc2PGuest52877
Irc2PGuest54664
Irc2PGuest59134
Irc2PGuest63193
Irc2PGuest87688
Irc2PGuest90091
Irc2PGuest90883
Nausicaa
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
Sleepy
Soni
StormyCloud
T3s|4
T3s|4_
Teeed
acetone_
aeiou
ardu
b3t4f4c3__
bak83_
boonst
cumlord
dickless
dr4wd3_
eyedeekay_bnc
foobar_
mareki2p
orignal_
poriori_
profetikla
qend-irc2p
rapidash
shiver_
solidx66
u5657
uop23ip
w8rabbit
x74a6
T3s|4
o/ zzz - I'm really impressed by the amount of effort you've devoted to ssu2 evaluation, given the still 'limited' number of routers involved in testing. Are we still far too early from your POV to enable ssu2 by default for several releases, or are you planning a randomized, slower roll out (i.e. 5-10% of routers ssu2 enabled by default, with an opt-out option), beginning with
T3s|4
1.8.1 (aka 0.9.55)? Would obtaining a far larger ssu2 'tester' router/user base help you in the next release?
zzz
T3s|4, no decisions made yet, we're going to discuss it at the next meeting in #ls2 next Monday, 6:30 PM UTC, if you'd like to join us
T3s|4
noted, and thanks zzz