@eyedeekay
&eche|on
&kytv
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN_
+acetone
+dr|z3d
+hk
+lbt
+orignal
+postman
+weko
+wodencafe
An0nm0n
Arch
Dann
DeltaOreo
FreefallHeavens
GucciferZ_
Irc2PGuest35128
Irc2PGuest43186
Irc2PGuest56267
Irc2PGuest59134
Irc2PGuest61987
Irc2PGuest99418
Leopold
Nausicaa
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
Over1
RN
Sisyphus
Sleepy
SoniEx2
T3s|4
T3s|4_
anon
b3t4f4c3__
bak83
boonst
carried6590
cumlord
dr4wd3
eyedeekay_bnc
l337s
not_bob_afk
poriori_
profetikla
qend-irc2p_
r3med1tz-
radakayot_
rapidash
scottpedia
shiver_
solidx66_
syncthing2
trust
u5657
uop23ip
w8rabbit
x74a6
T3s|4
o/ zzz - I'm really impressed by the amount of effort you've devoted to ssu2 evaluation, given the still 'limited' number of routers involved in testing. Are we still far too early from your POV to enable ssu2 by default for several releases, or are you planning a randomized, slower roll out (i.e. 5-10% of routers ssu2 enabled by default, with an opt-out option), beginning with
T3s|4
1.8.1 (aka 0.9.55)? Would obtaining a far larger ssu2 'tester' router/user base help you in the next release?
zzz
T3s|4, no decisions made yet, we're going to discuss it at the next meeting in #ls2 next Monday, 6:30 PM UTC, if you'd like to join us
T3s|4
noted, and thanks zzz