@eyedeekay
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+T3s|4
+acetone
+altonen
+dr|z3d
+hagen
+hk
+orignal
+postman
+qend-irc2p
+snex
+weko
+wodencafe
+y2kboy23
Arch
BubbRubb1
Daddy
Daddy_1
Danny
DeltaOreo
FreeB
FreefallHeavens
HowardPlayzOfAdmin
Irc2PGuest31631
Irc2PGuest41581
Irc2PGuest92548
Irc2PGuest95056
Leopold
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
Sisyphus
Sleepy
SlippyJoe_
StormyCloud_
T3s|4_
T3s|4__
Teeed
ardu
b3t4f4c3___
bak83_
boonst
defaultnick
dr4wd3_
eyedeekay_bnc
guest7621
not_bob_afk
not_human_
poriori_
profetikla
r00tobo
rapidash
shiver_
solidx66_
thetia
tr
u5657
uop23ip
w8rabbit
x74a6
T3s|4
o/ zzz - I'm really impressed by the amount of effort you've devoted to ssu2 evaluation, given the still 'limited' number of routers involved in testing. Are we still far too early from your POV to enable ssu2 by default for several releases, or are you planning a randomized, slower roll out (i.e. 5-10% of routers ssu2 enabled by default, with an opt-out option), beginning with
T3s|4
1.8.1 (aka 0.9.55)? Would obtaining a far larger ssu2 'tester' router/user base help you in the next release?
zzz
T3s|4, no decisions made yet, we're going to discuss it at the next meeting in #ls2 next Monday, 6:30 PM UTC, if you'd like to join us
T3s|4
noted, and thanks zzz