#ls2 (irc2p) | #ls2 proposal review channel : Reviews Tuesdays 7 PM UTC: none scheduled

zzz reminder: Proposal 160 review today 7 PM UTC

zzz if you're here for the meeting, please say hi, even if you're just planning to lurk ))

orignal hi

orignal bobr kurwa

zzz ok

zzz 0) hi

zzz ping eyedeekay dr|z3d R4SAS

zzz we're here today to review proposal 160, bittorrent UDP announces

zzz first proposed by me 11 years ago

zzz written up as a proposal 3 1/2 years ago

orignal seems only me here

zzz then on hold until we had datagram2 approved

orignal and I know nothing about torrents

zzz that's fine

zzz I did invite both R4SAS and biglybt via email

zzz anyway, the proposal is almost identical to standard BEP 15

zzz but it uses both new datagram types, 2 and 3, and raw

zzz support is checked into i2psnark as of a few days ago

zzz and checked into zzzot, unreleased

orignal do we have 3 already?

zzz big problem is I need somebody to test it on the zzzot side

zzz don't know about you, we checked in both datagram 2 and 3 support before the release a couple weeks ago

zzz cumlord, dr|z3d, any ideas on how we can get this tested?

orignal thanks will start implemnting datagram 3

zzz orignal, fine, but of course in snark standalone we'd use our datagram 3 implementation, would not use yours

zzz oh, additionally I also invited postman to this review via email

orignal I know

orignal going to start using them in UDP tunnels

zzz but I told him it would be 6-12 months before I could do a special tunnel type for him

zzz orignal, have you and R4SAS discussed how you would do a tunnel type for this for his opentracker?

cumlord it still can do regular tcp style announce and scraping?

zzz yes of course cumlord

orignal no

zzz cumlord, are you waiting for dr|z3d to merge support into his fork, or would you be willing to try my beta?

orignal he doesn't have time

zzz that was my answer to postman too...

cumlord i'd be willing to try it and use his when he gets around to it

zzz cumlord, you are running a zzzot with some traffic on it now, right?

cumlord if all other functionality is the same then see no reason not to i was worried about the scrape thing mainly

cumlord yeah i think it usually gets around 10-12k peers

zzz zzzot supports scrape but full scrape is now disabled by default in my version. What dr|z3d may have done to his, I have no idea

zzz but shouldn't be a problem to switch back to his version if something goes wrong

zzz anyway

zzz I don't think postman or biglybt intended to review this proposal, they're more in the 'wait until it's real and then I'll implement it' theory

cumlord i'll make a backup and try it out today then

zzz so is there anything anybody wants to comment about on the proposal itself, or any questions?

zzz if not, I'd ask for approval from the people here. I don't think if we had another review we'd get more attendance

zzz any objections? everybody happy?

zzz ok then, I realize bittorrent isn't anybody's specialty here

zzz but I'll declare it reviewed and approved )))

zzz we don't have anything else schedueld, anybody want to put anything on the calendar?

zzz okey dokey then

zzz thanks everybody!

orignal bye

eyedeekay Sorry I missed it, major wasn't showing my messages and by the time I got reconnected y'all were done

zzz eyedeekay, any comments or questions?

eyedeekay My only thing was that go-i2p-bt will test UDP trackers with SAM when dg2/3 become available in SAM

zzz yeah I took a little start at it but lost motivation

eyedeekay I won't be doing DHT anytime soon but datagram trackers I will do pretty immediately

zzz perhaps we could plan some target date for testing if I did the sam side, or perhaps you could take on the sam server side also

zzz is go-i2p-bt even a thing? don't recall seeing any clients out there

eyedeekay hk wrote one, it works quite well

eyedeekay I also have a cli

eyedeekay I will certainly try re Sam server side

eyedeekay That's actually the original point of onramp

eyedeekay To make go-i2p-bt work

zzz if you want. I started but all the sam code is a little spaghetti and I realized I needed more focus than I had to find the right place

eyedeekay I'll try and even if I fail I'll take notes :)

zzz but frankly, neither of us should probably be working on it, we both have more important things to do

eyedeekay True enough

zzz ))

eyedeekay I am also about 2/3 of the way to where I can deprecate sam3 and gosam in favor of go-sam-go as well and I do want to finish that this cycle, go-sam-go is where I'll do go's dg2/3 clients

dr|z3d sorry, missed this one. re zzzot, I'll look at pulling in your patches soon, zzz. just need to confirm I still have an intact codebase here.