@eyedeekay
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+RN_
+Stormycloud
+T3s|4
+anonymousmaybe
+dr|z3d
+eche|off
+hagen
+hk
+lance074
+mareki2p
+orignal
+postman
+qend-irc2p
+snex
+weko
+wodencafe
Arch
BubbRubb
Daddy_1
Danny
DeltaOreo
FreefallHeavens
HowardPlayzOfAdmin
Irc2PGuest30470
Irc2PGuest57893
Irc2PGuest82088
Irc2PGuest85022
Irc2PGuest86602
Leopold_
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
SigSegv
Sleepy
T3s|4_
Teeed
aargh
acetone
ardu
b3t4f4c3___
b4dab00m
bak83
cumlord
dr4wd3
duanin2
eyedeekay_bnc
idontpee
nnm
not_bob_afk
ohThuku1
poriori_
profetikla
r00tobo_BNC
rapidash
rascal
shiver_
solidx66
thetia
u5657
uop23ip
w8rabbit
wew
x74a6
lance074
Hello everyone, I'm trying to make IPFS work over I2P by adding a libp2p i2p transport and i was able to make the ipfs-lite implementation work with 3 nodes, one for bootstrapping the DHT, one that serve a file and one to download the file. For the transport i updated this: github.com/Jorropo/go-libp2p-i2p-transport to the latest libp2p version.
lance074
Now i'd like to test it with more nodes for it to be more realistic and i was wondering if it make sense to test on a single i2p router or should i start a router for each node?
lance074
I don't know much yet about the i2p or libp2p inner working, is there something i should know or consider regarding what i'm doing?
dr|z3d
hi lance074. if you can run a router per node, that will give you a better idea of how it runs on the network proper.
orignal
IPFS is a bad idea in general
lance074
why it's a bad idea? you mean on i2p or in general?
orignal
in general
orignal
IPFS is dead
lance074
Well maybe it's not used that much but i think that's because on the clearnet there are more convenient ways of distributing static files like CDNs, wouldn't be useful to have someting like IPFS in i2p? maybe embedded in the router for helping with the distribution of static files of the visited eepsites?
lance074
For bigger stuff torrent is better but you can't really use that to distribute the content of a website
dr|z3d
build it, they will come, lance074 :)