@eyedeekay
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+T3s|4
+acetone
+altonen
+dr|z3d
+hagen
+hk
+orignal
+postman
+qend-irc2p
+snex
+weko
+wodencafe
Arch
BubbRubb
Daddy
Daddy_1
Danny
DeltaOreo
FreeB
FreefallHeavens
HowardPlayzOfAdmin
Irc2PGuest19950
Irc2PGuest41581
Irc2PGuest92548
Irc2PGuest95056
Leopold
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
Sisyphus
Sleepy
SlippyJoe_
StormyCloud_
T3s|4_
Teeed
ardu
b3t4f4c3___
bak83_
boonst
defaultnick
dr4wd3_
eyedeekay_bnc
guest7621
not_bob_afk
not_human_
poriori_
profetikla
r00tobo
rapidash
shiver_
solidx66_
thetia
tr
u5657
uop23ip
w8rabbit
x74a6
zzz
sorry, broke the build, forgot something, stand by...
zzz
fixed, sorry folks
zzz
eyedeekay, would you accept a zero-risk datagram 2/3 PR for this release? zero-risk because it wouldn't be hooked into anything, just a base for possibly getting UDP announces in for 2.10
zzz
FYI website is syncing normally again
zzz
orignal, postman, R4SAS, dr|z3d, check your email re: UDP trackers
dr|z3d
looks promising, zzz. new tunnel type sounds like a bit of a pain, but hey, the price of progress, right?
zzz
I doubt we'd ever do it on the java side, unless postman really wanted to
zzz
I assume his tracker is from-scratch, not based on something that has UDP support in it?
dr|z3d
I think so, but you'd have to run the details by him.
dr|z3d
not entirely from scratch, he took some code and then basically rebuilt it, so probably amounts to the same thing.
zzz
so my assumption is that if anybody did a new tunnel type for it, it would be i2pd
zzz
because the R4SAS port of opentracker has UDP support
dr|z3d
you've got zzzot udp support mostly done, no?
zzz
yeah checked in 3 years ago, and mostly unaffected by the fast mode thrashing
zzz
the snark support is not checked in anywhere iirc, and I need to undo the fast mode stuff
zzz
I have three lines left to change to switch from datagram 1 to 2 and zzzot is done
dr|z3d
nice
eyedeekay
zzz yes I would accept as long as it's inert as you say
zzz
ok thanks, will work on it