@eyedeekay
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+T3s|4
+dr|z3d
+eche|off
+hk
+mareki2p
+not_bob_afk
+postman
+qend-irc2p
+snex
+weko
+wodencafe
Arch
BubbRubb1
Danny
DeltaOreo
FreeB
FreefallHeavens
HowardPlayzOfAdmin
Irc2PGuest53381
Irc2PGuest58086
Irc2PGuest89334
Leopold
Onn4l7h
Sisyphus
Sleepy
SlippyJoe
T3s|4_
Teeed
ardu
b3t4f4c3___
cumlord
death
dr4wd3_
eyedeekay_bnc
f00b4r
nnm--
ohThuku1_
orignal_
poriori
profetikla
r00tobo_BNC
rapidash
shiver_
solidx66
thetia
u5657
uop23ip
w8rabbit
wew
x74a6
RN
is this as interesting as it sounds? Dropping build request with the same previous and next hop
dr|z3d
RN: not really. it's an i2pd thing.
dr|z3d
in + we give them a little 15m ban or thereabouts.
RN
ah. I was thinking some kind of attack trying to get the peer before and after a connection
dr|z3d
shouldn't be permitted, but i2pd allows it.
RN
s/connection/dest
RN
why in the world would they allow that? it just sounds wrong to me.
dr|z3d
ask orignal, he knows :)
RN
оригинально, я был бы признателен, если бы вы могли объяснить логику разрешения этого (или даже разрешения узла в одном и том же туннеле более одного раза)
RN
orignal, I'd appreciate if you could explain the logic behind allowing that (or even allowing a peer in same tunnel more than once)
RN
(oh, it translated the nick too... not seen that happen before.)
orignal
yes, it's possible with i2pd
orignal
tunnel like A-B-A
orignal
we never have A-A-B for example
orignal
but such configuration if possible
orignal
why we allow it?
orignal
because we think it's better for anonymity
orignal
it eliminates possibility for an advesary to assume that peer can appear in a tunnel only once
dr|z3d
yeah, but if that peer happens to be the adversary, not so great.
orignal
that's still a topic to discuss
orignal
even if he is an advasry he doesn't know if it's the same tunnel or another
dr|z3d
maybe not directly, but you can't assume that's the only method an attacker will use to identify where he is in the tunnel chain.
orignal
that's what I mean. Both solutions have pros and cons
RN
thanks for the reply orignal. I'm not sure which is the right solution.