@eyedeekay
&kytv
+R4SAS
+RN
+T3s|4
+acetone
+dr|z3d
+hk
+lbt
+mareki2p
+orignal
+postman
+snex
+weko
+wodencafe
Arch
Danny
DeltaOreo
EnforcedParalegal
FreeB
FreefallHeavens
Irc2PGuest12735
Irc2PGuest137180
Irc2PGuest28373
Irc2PGuest30483
Irc2PGuest59134
Irc2PGuest64178
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
Sisyphus
Sleepy
StormyCloud
Teeed
aeiou
ardu
b3t4f4c3__
bak83
cumlord
death
dr4wd3
eyedeekay_bnc
hagen_
phil
poriori
profetik1
qend-irc2p
radakayot_
rapidash
shiver_
solidx66_
thetia
u5657
uop23ip
w8rabbit
x74a6
zzz
dr|z3d, obscuratus, proposed patch is up on gitlab
obscuratus
zzz: Thanks, I'll throw it up on my testing network.
dr|z3d
thanks, zzz, will take it for a spin.
dr|z3d
does this negate obscuratus' first LookupDestJob path, or can they be run side-by-side?
dr|z3d
*patch
zzz
the former
dr|z3d
ok, thanks
dr|z3d
patch looks good, zzz. easy way to test is to hit some of the b32 links on notbob, they should resolve immediately.
dr|z3d
(previously hitting a b32 would fail on first attempt)
obscuratus
zzz: The patch is working well so far on my testing network. Examining my logs, I can see the LS hitting the persistent data store much earlier, and the subsequent lookups are all successful.
obscuratus
I haven't found any errors or observable regressions so far.
zzz
thanks guys, I'll probably let it soak another day or two
dr|z3d
speaking of soaking, zzz, git.idk.i2p/i2p-hackers/i2p.i2p/-/merge_requests/49 ? :)
zzz
the zlatinb-proposed test regimen kinda squashed it
dr|z3d
oh :(